INQUIRER- FR JOACQUIN BERNAS
Before the appointment of Corona, I too had argued against recognizing the power of the president to make appointments during the prohibited two-month period. But the Supreme Court said, SHE COULD, and it was only AFTER the Court had SAID SO that SHE DID. Article 1 INSISTS that it was WRONG for the Court TO APPOINT HIM and shameless for Corona to accept the appointment. How would the Senate have resolved this issue?
Before the appointment of Corona, I too had argued against recognizing the power of the president to make appointments during the prohibited two-month period. But the Supreme Court said, SHE COULD, and it was only AFTER the Court had SAID SO that SHE DID. Article 1 INSISTS that it was WRONG for the Court TO APPOINT HIM and shameless for Corona to accept the appointment. How would the Senate have resolved this issue?
No comments:
Post a Comment