Friday, January 6, 2012
And anyway, why do they have to hire an ad agency? They appointed Mon Jimenez to the DOT job supposedly because he's a brilliant advertising man. So why can't he think of an ad campaign himself? Why do they have to pay for one? This administration touts itself as being so giving of themselves for the sake of the country. Sabi nila, bayan muna bago sarili. So why doesn't mon jimenez just volunteer his agency's services instead of hiring another one? It's more fun to spend the people's money!
So the administration tried to impeach justice del castillo for plagiarism. And what about them? Two DOT secretaries, and two completely copied national tourism slogans. And how much of the taxpayers' money did they spend to pay the ad campaigns? Millions! Talagang for them, it's more fun to spend the money of the people!
another tragedy at compostela valley - WHERE IS PNOY? the standard answer is:
- he's on top of the situation
- makakagulo lang sya sa rescue operation
- hindi sya manananggal na pwedeng hatiin and katawan
- hindi mahilig sa photo op
- naghahanap pa ng mga masisisi
- baka pwedeng ikonekta ang disaster kay GMA
- it's a weekend and pagod na sya.
- mas importante ma impeach si corona
STILL ANG TANONG: WHERE IS PNOY??
- he's on top of the situation
- makakagulo lang sya sa rescue operation
- hindi sya manananggal na pwedeng hatiin and katawan
- hindi mahilig sa photo op
- naghahanap pa ng mga masisisi
- baka pwedeng ikonekta ang disaster kay GMA
- it's a weekend and pagod na sya.
- mas importante ma impeach si corona
STILL ANG TANONG: WHERE IS PNOY??
TEDITORIAL
It is ignorant and inexcusable for a lawyers to say that we must save the Constitution from the Court.
The Court can never threaten the Constitution but it can fail to defend it when it should. A constitution is a list of limitations on government, on what it can do and, expressly or by implication, what it cannot. On the other hand, a constitution recognizes the inalienable rights of the individual which the state cannot, without compelling reason found only in the constitution, abridge, such as the right to travel but for three constitutional exceptions thereto. Therefore the Court cannot threaten the Constitution but it can, by a wrong ruling, deny to individuals their inalienable rights, such as the right to travel, the right of expression in detention, the right to be informed of charges and not just conclusions of law -- either because of peculation in the court, undue deference to the president or corruption therefrom. But it did not. The court can never threaten the constitution but it can fail to protect the constitution, our rights, our liberties and the laws. Keep well.
It is ignorant and inexcusable for a lawyers to say that we must save the Constitution from the Court.
The Court can never threaten the Constitution but it can fail to defend it when it should. A constitution is a list of limitations on government, on what it can do and, expressly or by implication, what it cannot. On the other hand, a constitution recognizes the inalienable rights of the individual which the state cannot, without compelling reason found only in the constitution, abridge, such as the right to travel but for three constitutional exceptions thereto. Therefore the Court cannot threaten the Constitution but it can, by a wrong ruling, deny to individuals their inalienable rights, such as the right to travel, the right of expression in detention, the right to be informed of charges and not just conclusions of law -- either because of peculation in the court, undue deference to the president or corruption therefrom. But it did not. The court can never threaten the constitution but it can fail to protect the constitution, our rights, our liberties and the laws. Keep well.
Former Pres., JE Estrada warns: CJ Corona;
1. He is presumed innocent until proven guilty, he should fight on;
2. Expect that the impeachment trial to turn like a telenovela as created by the media;
3. He should get good lawyers and think about how to counter each allegations;
4. He should always air his side;
5. He should be ready to be embarrassed but if he is innocent, Estrada believes the law will prevail.
1. He is presumed innocent until proven guilty, he should fight on;
2. Expect that the impeachment trial to turn like a telenovela as created by the media;
3. He should get good lawyers and think about how to counter each allegations;
4. He should always air his side;
5. He should be ready to be embarrassed but if he is innocent, Estrada believes the law will prevail.
New DOT tourism slogan "It's more fun in the Philippines" draws flak in cyberspace for being unoriginal. A 1951 tourism ad for Switzerland shows the slogan "It's more fun in Switzerland." First they copied the logo of Poland with the failed "Pilipinas Kay Ganda" slogan, and now they copied the whole slogan from Switzerland. And at a time like this - people in Cagayan de Oro, Iligan, Negros Oriental, and Compostela Valley are certainly not having fun. Neither were the HK tourist in Luneta in 2010. Palpak talaga.
Dorinila, Inquirer: There's no doubt if the overzealous prosecutors would put a stop to their serial revelation of their evidence partly because they consider themselves above the norms of fairness; because they have their own rules and partly because they are driven by the objective to convict Corona at all costs, fair or foul-which is their marching order. The other apparent purpose in demonizing Corona ahead of the trial is to completely humiliate and crush him in what now appears as a scorched earth policy of total destruction, WHERE NI LIVING CREATURE CAN SURVIVED.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)