Ciudad Fernandina forum: kit Tatad said sobra na ang pakikialam ng palasyo at sila mismo ang nag coconfirm sa authenticity ng bank documents.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
6:55-6:59/DZRH/COMMENTARIES BY D. MACALMA AND R. SIBAYAN
-KAILAN KAYA AAHON ANG MGA PANGUNAHING ISSUE NA MAY KINALAMAN SA SIKMURA NI JUAN DELA CRUZ KAGAYA NG PAGTAAS NG PRESYO NG GASOLINA, PRESYO NG MGA PANGUNAHING BILIHIN, SWELDO NG MGA MANGGAGAWA. MASYADO NA TAYONG NALILIBING SA ISSUE NG IMPEACHMENT AT ANG MGA PANGUNAHING SEBRISYO SA GOBYERNO MR. PRESIDENT AY NAKAKALIMUTAN NA!
ANC: Interview with Ernesto Maceda
-A mistrial is very unlikely. Kit Tatad broke the story on alleged P100M bribe on my radio program but I don't think he is the source of the story. There is partiality especially among the liberal party members.
-Progress of the impeachment trial is very, very slow. Prosecution has been very competent, senator, judges are asking too many questions. I think it will be bad for the prosecution to drop other articles.
ANC: IMPEACHMENT VS. CJ CORONA 2:42-2:53 - Impeachment Court orders prosecution and defense to submit memorandum on legality of subpoena in 5 days. Santiago: "In the first place, I don't know why we're talking about a search warrant. This court did not issue a search warrant. The issue is can a counsel attach a document on which he knows nothing about? Why did you do this to the court? Can you allege something that you have info but based on anonymous source?! You'll be cited for contempt. You cannot base request for subpoena by citing an anonymous source. This is a very strange, bizarre document. Can that be a basis for issuance of subpoena?"
prosecution in a bind- a lose-lose situation:
If the bank docs are fake- they can be charged of falsification or manufacturing fraudulent docs if they are genuine - they are guilty of showing illegally acquired evidence. worse and unforgivable - they dragged the court's name into the quicksand with their dirty tricks.
If the bank docs are fake- they can be charged of falsification or manufacturing fraudulent docs if they are genuine - they are guilty of showing illegally acquired evidence. worse and unforgivable - they dragged the court's name into the quicksand with their dirty tricks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)