cyber-attacks by palace backed hackers on media sites critical of the government should go to jail first. palace propagandists besmirching reputations of their perceived political opponents through fake bloggers and rumor sites should be investigated by DOJ and NBI UNLESS cyber-crime law is interpreted to TARGET only their critics while their attack dogs can FREELY attack their victims.
Monday, February 24, 2014
TRIBUNE: MEDIA killings in RP deeply 'troubling' - US
The United States views the killing of jour-nalists in the Philippines as "deeply troubling," its ambassador yesterday said, adding his voice to growing criticism from local and international watchdog groups. "Attempts to silence journalists are deeply troubling and not acceptable," US Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg told reporters. "Democracy needs free press," he stressed even as he reaffirmed the close alliance between Washington and Manila.
The United States views the killing of jour-nalists in the Philippines as "deeply troubling," its ambassador yesterday said, adding his voice to growing criticism from local and international watchdog groups. "Attempts to silence journalists are deeply troubling and not acceptable," US Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg told reporters. "Democracy needs free press," he stressed even as he reaffirmed the close alliance between Washington and Manila.
EDSA'S PUBLIC ENEMY NO 1 - PNOY AS DEMOCRACY'S SERIAL KILLER corrupted the legislative by BRIBES thru PDAF and DAP. bought peace by SUBDIVIDING the country and genuflecting before Malaysia. murdering the UNBORN through passage of the RH law. shabbily treated victims of calamities by not responding swiftly and mounting a turtle-paced rehab operation. blatant display of arrogance in mishandling luneta massacre by absolving his officials of culpability. extinguished the right of the population to free themselves of hunger and poverty by false economic data and prepaid surveys. refusing to act aggressively in returning hacienda luisita to its rightful owners.
Our honorable solons got 6.5B from Pnoy's DAP funds to impeach CJ Corona. 5B to the Congressmen and 1.5B to the Senators. How come there are no calls for an investigation? Will the dirty senators investigate themselves? Will the dirty congressmen investigate themselves? How about Pnoy, why won't he have DOJ investigate this corruption? Investigate themselves? That would be a miracle!!!
INQUIRER: Solons got P5B in DAP during impeachment trial of Corona
The Aquino administration used P6.5 billion from the little-known Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) before, during and after the impeachment trial of then Chief Justice Renato Corona to bend Congress to its will, two members of the House of Representatives told the Inquirer. The sources estimated that the House got as much as P5 billion in DAP funds, while the senators received the remaining P1.5 billion, as admitted by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) itself.
The Aquino administration used P6.5 billion from the little-known Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) before, during and after the impeachment trial of then Chief Justice Renato Corona to bend Congress to its will, two members of the House of Representatives told the Inquirer. The sources estimated that the House got as much as P5 billion in DAP funds, while the senators received the remaining P1.5 billion, as admitted by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) itself.
MANILA STANDARD: FR RANI AQUINO - THE RIGHT TO BAIL
The right to bail SHALL NOT BE IMPAIRED EVEN when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED. "Shall be bailable - in the law, 'shall' mandates. This has led to the traditional formulation of the rule: In all cases except those punishable by reclusion perpetua (or, under special penal laws, life imprisonment) BAIL IS A MATTER OF RIGHT.When the offense of which a person stands accused is punishable by reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, and EVIDENCE OF GUILT IS STRONG, it DOES NOT FOLLOW that bail must be denied, because that is NOT what the Constitution provides. IT ONLY SUBJECTS THE GRANT OF BAIL TO JUDICIAL DISCRETION. Bail is available then in all cases, if the judge would exercise discretion in favor of its concession, and discretion precisely means that IT IS THE JUDGE'S CALL. The judge must judge!
The right to bail SHALL NOT BE IMPAIRED EVEN when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED. "Shall be bailable - in the law, 'shall' mandates. This has led to the traditional formulation of the rule: In all cases except those punishable by reclusion perpetua (or, under special penal laws, life imprisonment) BAIL IS A MATTER OF RIGHT.When the offense of which a person stands accused is punishable by reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, and EVIDENCE OF GUILT IS STRONG, it DOES NOT FOLLOW that bail must be denied, because that is NOT what the Constitution provides. IT ONLY SUBJECTS THE GRANT OF BAIL TO JUDICIAL DISCRETION. Bail is available then in all cases, if the judge would exercise discretion in favor of its concession, and discretion precisely means that IT IS THE JUDGE'S CALL. The judge must judge!
MANILA STANDARD: FR RANI AQUINO - THE RIGHT TO BAIL
The right to bail SHALL NOT BE IMPAIRED EVEN when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED. "Shall be bailable - in the law, 'shall' mandates. This has led to the traditional formulation of the rule: In all cases except those punishable by reclusion perpetua (or, under special penal laws, life imprisonment) BAIL IS A MATTER OF RIGHT.When the offense of which a person stands accused is punishable by reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, and EVIDENCE OF GUILT IS STRONG, it DOES NOT FOLLOW that bail must be denied, because that is NOT what the Constitution provides. IT ONLY SUBJECTS THE GRANT OF BAIL TO JUDICIAL DISCRETION. Bail is available then in all cases, if the judge would exercise discretion in favor of its concession, and discretion precisely means that IT IS THE JUDGE'S CALL. The judge must judge!
The right to bail SHALL NOT BE IMPAIRED EVEN when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED. "Shall be bailable - in the law, 'shall' mandates. This has led to the traditional formulation of the rule: In all cases except those punishable by reclusion perpetua (or, under special penal laws, life imprisonment) BAIL IS A MATTER OF RIGHT.When the offense of which a person stands accused is punishable by reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, and EVIDENCE OF GUILT IS STRONG, it DOES NOT FOLLOW that bail must be denied, because that is NOT what the Constitution provides. IT ONLY SUBJECTS THE GRANT OF BAIL TO JUDICIAL DISCRETION. Bail is available then in all cases, if the judge would exercise discretion in favor of its concession, and discretion precisely means that IT IS THE JUDGE'S CALL. The judge must judge!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)