TRIBUNE: OPPOSITION SNOWBALLS VS NAPOLES AS WITNESS

"Napoles testified before the Senate, denying so many things under oath. Now, here she comes, submitting a sworn affidavit containing her full disclosure in the scam," Luy's counsel said. "which of her statements is now true?

TRIBUNE: NINEZ CACHO-OLIVARES - COOKING UP A DEAL

That there was a deal between Napoles and Leila can hardly be denied and part of the deal is to sanitize certain names in the list who are part of Noynoy's protected species. Already, in a Facebook account of broadcaster Arnold Clavio, there was this item saying that listed was Leila's ex, whom he said reportedly got P8 million from Janet, but that his name was deleted from the affidavit. Who else in the list got deleted? And why should names be deleted, if, as claimed by Leila, there will be no political color and the list and affidavit will not be sanitized?

TRIBUNE: NINEZ CACHO-OLIVARES - COOKING UP A DEAL

Who can believe that, especially, as Leila herself made her a principal in the complaint, and when Leila herself along with her whistle-blowers, pointed to Janet as the mastermind! And now the mastermind is being considered by Leila as state witness? She certainly isn't the least guilty, and she is seen as the most guilty, yet she gets to have state witness status?

http://www.polbits.com/?m=1

When will Napoles' touted rell-all sworn statement be released to public, or will it suffer the same fate as the 2007-2009 COA report that has singled out only three opposition senators? Since there was no witness to her marathon "confession" except for her lawyer (wasn't he sent out of the room by DOJ Chief at critical part?) how would public know if De Lima edited portions? Why the special treatment of Napoles until now? Was it because she was heavy contributor to LP campaign kitty for 2010 and 2013? For instance, was it true that the part alleging that De Lima's former husband, Atty. Plaridel Bohol, received P8 million from PDAF funds was stricken out?

MANILA BULLETIN: Threats prompt Napoles to tell all - De Lima
--- THREATS from WHOM???

MLA STANDARD: EDITORIAL - FOOLING US ALL OVER AGAIN

Given that Napoles has been accused of being the mastermind behind the scam and amassing an obscene amount of ill-gotten wealth, it would be difficult indeed to sell her to an angry public as the new star witness for the state. That would be patently unjust. But stranger things involving Napoles have happened in this administration, and they all point to the special treatment that top officials, headed by President Benigno Aquino III, have accorded her. If the charges against Napoles are proved correct - and the government is adamant that it has strong case - why is it treating her with kid gloves? In diverting billions of public funds, Napoles and company fooled all of us. Should we, in the name of prosecutorial convenience allow her and this administration to fool us again?

state witness benhur luy points to janet napoles as mastermind with lawmakers as recipients. now DOJ thinks napoles can be a state witness too! where will this place luy and company who testified against napoles? isn't napoles guilty of perjury as she lied oath that she denied knowing anything? if napoles is accepted as state witness, will it mean that the government is coddling the main players of the crime while prosecuting only the alleged recipients? huwad na daan at baluktot na paraan?

FLASH!!!

Former husband of Justice Sec. Leila De Lima, Atty. Plaridel Bohol, was mentioned by Janet Lim-Napoles in her affidavit last night to received P8 million 'kickback' from her PDAF operations. But his name was stricken out by the Secretary. WHY?!?

NEWS - DE LIMA: Napoles ready to tell all
--- its a choice between the devil and the deep blue sea. she chose the devil.