ON DAP ORAL ARGUMENT: Justifying corruption of the rule of law by proclaiming ignorance and pleading absence of culpability by mere stoppage of such illegal practice is A TWISTED ARGUMENT DESIGNED as a MOCKERY of the intelligence and wisdom of the sitting JUSTICES of the HIGHEST COURT of the land. FAILING to get an extension, this the KIND of LEGAL ARGUMENT that needed MORE TIME to ADD more spice and garnishings on A POORLY CONCOCTED RECIPE. In this case, the adage too many "CROOKS" spoil the broth maybe applicable. PATHETIC.
No comments:
Post a Comment