DZMM Teleradyo: Nilinaw ni ALMC Exec Director Vicente Aquino na hindi nila inimbestigahan si dating SC Justice Renato Corona at hindi resulta ng pagsiyasat sa bank accounts nito ang inilabas na report. Aniya, ang AMLC report na isinumite kay Omb Carpio-Morales na iprinisinta naman sa Senate impeachment court ay base sa datos ng mga bangko na electronically submitted sa kanilang tanggapan. Hindi naman diretsang masagot ni Aquino kung kaya niyang panindigan na 100-percent accurate ang AMLC report lalo't hindi naman sila nagsagawa ng sariling imbestigasyon kay Corona.
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
ANC: Midas Marquez: Corona stood for judicial independence. Marquez adds, though found guilty for SALN omissions, Corona did not commit graft and corruption. Marquez also was not shocked by Corona's $2.4 M "That's roughly P100M. If we ask senators or congressmen who among then do not have that large amount of money, only 1 or 2 will probly raise their hands," Marquez said.
ITANONG kay heidi mendoza - paanong computation ang ginawa niya? si Ombudsman Morales ba ang nag-utos na LAKIHAN ang kwenta? patay mali ba si vicente aquino sa pagbibigay ng maling inpormasyon para LUMAKI ang kwenta? mabuhay ang BAGONG KKK!!! Ombudsman, COA and AMLC - KAKAUNTSABA,KASAPAKAT at KASABWAT!
DZRH ISSUE: Deo Macalma -Bon voyage Mr. President!
- Medyo malaki-laki ang delegasyon ni Pangulong Aquino, aba'y 8 Cabinet members at 15 negosyante. Sana nga ay maging maganda ang kahinatnan ng kaniyang biyahe sa UK. Kaya lang malaki ang problema ngayon ng mga miyembro ng European Union sa kanilang ekonomiya. So paano tayo makakahikayat ng mga investors sa UK?
- Medyo malaki-laki ang delegasyon ni Pangulong Aquino, aba'y 8 Cabinet members at 15 negosyante. Sana nga ay maging maganda ang kahinatnan ng kaniyang biyahe sa UK. Kaya lang malaki ang problema ngayon ng mga miyembro ng European Union sa kanilang ekonomiya. So paano tayo makakahikayat ng mga investors sa UK?
Monday, June 4, 2012
Dzmm reporter:
>naghain ng urgent motion for oral arguments at issuance of preliminary injunction sa sc ang grupo ni atty alan paguia kaugnay sa nakabinbin nilang petisyon na kumukwestiyon sa hurisdiksyon ng senate impeachment court kay dating cj corona.
>iginiit ni paguia na walang hurisdiksyon ang senado sa napatalsik na punong mahistrado.
>sinabi rin niya sa sa ilalim ng batas hindi naging moot o hindi nawalan ng saysay ang nauna nilang mosyon kahit nahatulan na ng guilty si corona.
>naghain ng urgent motion for oral arguments at issuance of preliminary injunction sa sc ang grupo ni atty alan paguia kaugnay sa nakabinbin nilang petisyon na kumukwestiyon sa hurisdiksyon ng senate impeachment court kay dating cj corona.
>iginiit ni paguia na walang hurisdiksyon ang senado sa napatalsik na punong mahistrado.
>sinabi rin niya sa sa ilalim ng batas hindi naging moot o hindi nawalan ng saysay ang nauna nilang mosyon kahit nahatulan na ng guilty si corona.
DZBB: ISSUE: PNOY STATE VISIT TO LONDON AND US:
Bishop Emeritus Oscar Cruz, naniniwala na pandagdag boladas lang sa gagawing SONA ni Pangulong Aquino ang pagtungo nito sa UK at Estados Unidos. Inaasahan na ni Cruz na isasama ni Pnoy sa kaniyang SONA ang mga biyahe nito sa abroad at ang mga investments na nakuha mula sa mga biyaheng ito upang bolahin ang taongbayan.
Bishop Emeritus Oscar Cruz, naniniwala na pandagdag boladas lang sa gagawing SONA ni Pangulong Aquino ang pagtungo nito sa UK at Estados Unidos. Inaasahan na ni Cruz na isasama ni Pnoy sa kaniyang SONA ang mga biyahe nito sa abroad at ang mga investments na nakuha mula sa mga biyaheng ito upang bolahin ang taongbayan.
ANC TEDITORIAL: So when senator-judges announced at the end, the decision they made before the trial started and they cited the case of Delsa Flores, it was sheer hypocrisy. But there was, after all, justice of a kind.
But was the decision to fire Delsa Flores handed down by the Corona court? of course not. The decision was over 15 years ago. Was Corona even sitting in the court? Of course not. That was over 15 years ago.
And supposing he was, the so were all the current members of the court. They should all have been impeached and convicted for this terrible wrong, even if wrong decision are unimpeachable in constitutional law.
In the thinking of the senator-judges (assuming you think they can think), not only is the chief alone of his court, but he guilty also of what neither he nor his court ever ruled on. Now if that isn't nonsense, what is?
Keep well.
But was the decision to fire Delsa Flores handed down by the Corona court? of course not. The decision was over 15 years ago. Was Corona even sitting in the court? Of course not. That was over 15 years ago.
And supposing he was, the so were all the current members of the court. They should all have been impeached and convicted for this terrible wrong, even if wrong decision are unimpeachable in constitutional law.
In the thinking of the senator-judges (assuming you think they can think), not only is the chief alone of his court, but he guilty also of what neither he nor his court ever ruled on. Now if that isn't nonsense, what is?
Keep well.
ANC TEDITORIAL: So when senator-judges announced at the end, the decision they made before the trial started and they cited the case of Delsa Flores, it was sheer hypocrisy. But there was, after all, justice of a kind.
But was the decision to fire Delsa Flores handed down by the Corona court? of course not. The decision was over 15 years ago. Was Corona even sitting in the court? Of course not. That was over 15 years ago.
And supposing he was, the so were all the current members of the court. They should all have been impeached and convicted for this terrible wrong, even if wrong decision are unimpeachable in constitutional law.
In the thinking of the senator-judges (assuming you think they can think), not only is the chief alone of his court, but he guilty also of what neither he nor his court ever ruled on. Now if that isn't nonsense, what is?
Keep well.
But was the decision to fire Delsa Flores handed down by the Corona court? of course not. The decision was over 15 years ago. Was Corona even sitting in the court? Of course not. That was over 15 years ago.
And supposing he was, the so were all the current members of the court. They should all have been impeached and convicted for this terrible wrong, even if wrong decision are unimpeachable in constitutional law.
In the thinking of the senator-judges (assuming you think they can think), not only is the chief alone of his court, but he guilty also of what neither he nor his court ever ruled on. Now if that isn't nonsense, what is?
Keep well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)